The financial and timeline risks and concerns discussed in this docket are as follows:
Financial Risks and Concerns:
- The annual dues for participation in the Spare Transformer Equipment Program (STEP) are $8,500 for 2025, up from $7,500 in 2024. Although these costs are described as minor relative to the program's benefits, there is an explicit recognition that program costs, though low, are not negligible. In future years, these dues will be split evenly among Avangrid’s four electric operating companies, but for 2025, the full amount has already been paid by United Illuminating Company, and NYSEG or RG&E will not be allocated a share for this year
1,
1.
- The companies are directed to file annual reports of all costs associated with the program, including detailed workpapers on cost allocation among Avangrid utilities. This ongoing reporting requirement reflects a concern for transparency and oversight of costs
1,
1.
- There is also a requirement to file accounting and ratemaking treatment details within six months after any transformer transaction, indicating a need to address potential impacts on ratepayers and utility financials
1.
- If spare transformers are purchased for the program, purchases must follow established practices and be capitalized, not booked to non-utility plant, which impacts rate recovery and depreciation schedules
1.
Timeline Risks and Concerns:
- Regulatory approval processes for transfers under PSL § 70 generally require 90 to 120 days, which could delay emergency response. The order addresses this by granting pre-authorization for future transfers in national emergencies, thus eliminating administrative delays and enabling rapid response
1.
- There are strict deadlines for reporting and notifications: companies must notify relevant offices within 48 hours of a transformer purchase request and within 30 days of a completed transfer. Failure to meet these deadlines could lead to compliance issues
1.
- The secretary has discretion to extend deadlines, but extension requests must be made in writing at least three days in advance, suggesting that late or inadequate requests could result in procedural non-compliance
1,
1.
In summary, the docket highlights minor but real financial obligations, the need for careful cost allocation and reporting, and potential risks of delay or non-compliance with tight regulatory timelines, though the pre-authorization mechanism is intended to mitigate emergency response delays.